Dear Mark Sisson, Regarding The Efficacy of Carnivorous Diets
Thursday, January 14, 2010 at 2:53PM
Let me kick of this post by saying that I'm a huge fan of Mark Sisson. I've linked to his site many times, I tell friends of mine that are looking to get into nutrition to visit his site (not mine) and have found him to be quite enjoyable on his numerous podcast interviews.
That's why it's disheartening that in his latest post, he included me in his article to cast doubt upon the efficacy of carnivorous diets.
Mark posted a link to the disturbing picture of my leg that I shared with the world. If I can sum up the whole post in a sentence or two; I was experiencing some kind of deficiency, that was later cured when I ate a higher volume of food (pemmican).
When you experiment the way I do, you're bound to run into a few road blocks. I work through them, I learn and I'm a better man at the end of the day.
My beef with Mark's article is… why chose me? Mark mentions one real life carnivorous eater in his article that happens to be myself. When the reader clicks on the link to my weblog they are greeted with a disgusting picture of my leg with ZERO context. The achievements made by all stars: Charles Washington, Lex Rooker, and Joe Andersen; all would have been better choices to represent what a carnivorous lifestyle can do. Highlighting me, someone that has been diagnosed with mercury and lead poisoning might not be an honest inquiry to the actual legitimacy of carnivory.
While the start of this weblog was to champion the zero carb lifestyle, it has blossomed into more of an open ended experiment guided by what works, and what doesn't. I've never claimed to be a success story, but only that a carnivorous diet has changed my life for the better. The deterioration of my leg in that photo was a small price to pay to win back my hair, good sleep, reduce my stress level, and increase my libido.
Early on in the article however, Mark says something that I couldn't agree with more.
"Now, avoiding all carbs because you feel better without them? I can get behind that."
To be honest, I'm not sure too many carnivorous eaters would have been drawn to the concept without coming to the same conclusion Mark speaks of. The very reason someone is engaging in a zero carb diet usually means that other ways of eating failed them. I know that's why I'm here.
As I've said before, those with severely damaged metabolisms, digestive issues, and eating disorders are likely to benefit from dropping carbs all together. Finding out your "carb tolerance" is a misnomer. For some people it's none. Options like carnivory, should always be on the table.
It's no secret that Mark and I part ways when vegetables and fruits are introduced to the diet. I truly believe that in the near future, vegetables and fruit will be thrown in the conventional wisdom bucket next to the diet heart hypothesis. My stance that fruits and fiber are harmful and vegetables are baron of nutrition is as strong as ever. Review the information and decide for yourself.
- Soft drinks, fructose consumption, and the risk of gout in men: prospective cohort study.
- Fructose is a coronary risk factor
- Fruits & Vegetables Increase Oxidation
- Fructose: The Bitter Truth (Video)
- Fiber is shit, here's why
- The Case Against Fruits & Vegetables
I've decided to repost this article due to the numerous requests from readers. I've edited the article to remove some of the things that were thrown in due to the heat of the moment.
Recently Mark Sisson kindly reached out to me; putting an end to the frustration I was feeling. Having a few extra days to ruminate about his article lead me to the conclusion that we're just two low carb folk on different paths. The fact that Mark took the time to contact me says a lot about his integrity and his willingness to better the low community. He's solid dude in my book.
Danny Roddy | Comments Off | 
Reader Comments (16)
Mark's comment was nearly parenthetical. Why the beef?
lol Danny, way to take it personal!!! Can we call this the 3rd pemmican war?
Thanks for reading Jeff,
I disagree. Using my situation to illustrate the dangers of a zero carb diet is misleading. There is a much larger picture here.
Thanks for commenting CMR,
I hope wasn't too abrasive. I really do genuinely dig Mark's site.
I, personally, took Mark's observations on this matter with a grain of salt.
He lead me to better health, definitely, but what he doesn't realize is that I found a more 'carnivorous only/ zero carb' diet to be of more benefit after applying his methods.
So many people think that I am now constipated with only meat and fat. Nothing could be further from the truth regarding fiber! I found that pure meat and fat result in better stool and once veggies are re-introduced, the stool hardens. This, to me, seems to debunk the fiber theory.
I am still on the fence on fiber, though, The doctor who recorded the video for "Sugar: The Bitter Truth" explained everything regarding metabolism and it's role with sugars quite well, but he is also a big proponent of fiber. I guess, though, if you are eating things with fructose in them, then the fiber is necessary.
I'm more with you though. As much as Mark has changed my life, I love him for that, but I'm more on your side, in that I just feel FANTASTIC on only meat. Although, I do eat eggs. I lump them into my 'meat' category.
I'm not ZC because I cannot eat carbs. I'm ZC because carbs do not make us as humans optimally healthy. That is the problem with traditional low carb diets like Atkins, etc. Carbs are treated as a reward, as in, "how high up the ladder can you go?" I think all carbs are disgusting and deleterious. If you want to be lean and strong like a carnivore, to never be hungry, to eat delicious fatty meat, be zero carb. I lift, I have so much energy, I am never hungry, I don't spend a lot of money on food, I don't need to think of ingredients. Carbs make us weak, sick and fat prey. Meat makes us strong, lean, defined, energetic predators and hunters. Meat makes us gods, carbs make us lower than worms.
You know you made something of yourself when someone intentionally misleads others using your example. Did he ever say that your leg fully recovered within a day or so of eating more? Its really quite sad seeing someone taking advantage of incomplete information. I feel this is one of the biggest faults of modern man. We have the hardest time being fully honest. From what I can tell you tell it like it is and I hope that this one incident does not keep you from exposing both the good and the bad from your personal experiences. The truth is so much easier to find if we are all just honest, but yet it seems so hard to do.
Thanks for commenting SassaFrass88,
I couldn't agree more. Mark's site is a great stepping stone for those wanting to get off SAD and achieve good health. For over achievers there's always VLC and carnivorous lifestyles.
I've seen that same video, which is amazing, but yeah the gentleman in my opinion is off base with regards to fiber. It's entirely possible however, that when carbohydrates are included in the diet fiber may be needed.
For the record, I have nothing against eggs.
Keep going with what works, I'm glad you're feeling so good.
Thanks for commenting Katelyn,
Those raised on SAD probably do not have the luxury of climbing the carb ladder. But it's always an option if you're looking to gain lots of fat and have a cocaine-like addiction to food!
Thanks for commenting Teddy,
Mark doesn't mention specifics in the article, so hopefully his readers check out the whole article before passing judgement.
Anything good or bad resulting from diet will be shared on this site. Hopefully it will be a valuable resource for those who are attempting similar feats.
Thanks for putting this back up Danny! Truly there are so many resources available these days for people to learn more about ZC and VLC like yours and Mark's. You guys are obviously helping other people understand what you each believe to be the best way to go about optimal health. The fact that by applying Mark's methods some people "evolve" to ZC on their own to me shows how closely the paths you each chose really come. I didn't read the first reaponse but this one seemed above board and totally appropriate. LOVE YOUR BLOG!!
Thanks for reading Karen,
I can get on board with everything you just said.
The first response was a little less clear. I took a big deep breath and made some edits.
I'm glad you're enjoying the weblog!
I'm glad Mark contacted you... I mean I understand we all have different points of view but going one against the other is not good at all. It's like someone from Mark's forum started criticizing Atkins because he allowed too many processed food and dairy and one here did that too but because it's "too high in carbs", don’t we all owe Atkins the fact he played a great role spreading the Low Carb message? i mean each of you guys are doing a great job promoting low carb, it doesn’t matter if it is 150gr or 0gr, the thing is that you are getting people to realize low carb is an option (we know it is the best but let's say it's "one of the best")
I like your site, and stumbled upon it awhile ago, but I wouldn't say that a zero carbohydrate approach is for EVERYONE. At the absolute most, I might have 58 grams of carbohydrate(including fiber) a day, so I'm not eating as much of it as Mark, but still a little more then you. 58 is the maximum I might find myself eating from what I calculated, but I'm usually in the 30's.
However, my ancestors are probably a little closer to the equator then yours were, and had a decent amount of fruits and veggies. Humans did evolve for millions of years off of fruits and vegetables before they essentially became "human" by eating lots more meat, so they still have the genetic make up to handle those fruits and vegetables, and have them be beneficial to their diet. Only those people that went up north are less likely to receive those benefits I think.
That being said, I can hardly call myself an omnivore by eating a small handful of wolf berries and munching on a little celery. I'd still consider myself a carnivore, as most would from seeing my diet.
Hey Mary,
Agreed.
Thanks for commenting Lala,
I agree, many may not have to go down to zero carbs. It highly depends on the current level of health.
Sounds like you're doing great.
I enjoy your site. I also enjoy Mark's site. Truth is, I thought that was the equivalent of a cyberspace drive by shooting. Of course there is nothing wrong with critiquing someone as long as you represent them properly by giving every thing the proper meaning and context. Suggesting scurvy given what you wrote was out of bounds, in my opinion. I am glad he reached out to you privately. Not that it is any of my business but if he hasn't made a public acknowledgement (since he wrote the comment for public consumption) I hope he does so shortly.
Thanks for reading Michael,
My thoughts exactly.
Um, that is truly one bad looking wheel. I haven't looked closely at what you eat, but you may need to include organ meats. Very important for Vitamin A, which is also important in Vitamin D levels, all of which are tied into skin stuff and bruising. It's all synergistic, obviously, especially the fat soluble vits. See Weston A. Price website to get the full story. Try to ignore that they like grains. The rest of the info is solid. Good luck. jean
Thanks for reading Jean,
Recently I have incorporated high vitamin cod liver oil into my regime to assure adequate vitamin A. So far so good.
Danny